Sunday, October 30, 2016


2 Kings 23:5
He did away with the idolatrous priests appointed by the kings of Judah to burn incense on the high places of the towns of Judah and on those around Jerusalem--those who burned incense to Baal, to the sun and moon, to the constellations and to all the starry hosts.

Deuteronomy  4:16,19
Beware lest you act corruptly by making a carved image for yourselves, in the form of any figure, ..."And when you look up to the sky and see the sun, the moon and the stars--all the heavenly array--do not be enticed into bowing down to them and worshiping things the LORD your God has apportioned to all the nations under heaven.

Catholic SUN Worship? 

Monstrances are usually elaborate in design; most are carried by the priest. Others may be much larger fixed constructions, typically for displaying the host in a special side chapel, often called the "Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament". For portable designs, the preferred form is a sunburst.

Saturday, October 29, 2016


Deuteronomy 4:32
Now search all of history, from the time God created people on the earth until now, and search from one end of the heavens to the other. Has anything as great as this ever been seen or heard before?

The boundary of our solar system is the heliosphere's edge. The heliosphere is all that area where the solar wind's outflow tends to predominate over incoming interstellar radiation. There is a loosely defined boundary where the solar winds drop off and cosmic radiation heading toward the solar system begins to predominate. But as you can imagine, this is not a sudden shift. It's not a stable line, either. The intensities of both the solar winds and cosmic radiation vary substantially over time, so it's a constantly shifting zone.

It's somewhat like this with galaxies. In general, we define a galaxy as all that space within which the gravitational pull of the galaxy's center of mass is still strong enough to keep stars in orbit around the galactic core. But this is a highly amorphous line. Its exact location differs by coordinate and is controlled by the mass and center of mass of the galaxy in question as it competes with other large-scale structures nearby. As you can imagine, the mass and coordinate location of the nearby large scale structures is a constantly moving, seething target. So long as there isn't a competing mass overpowering that of the galaxy in question, it would be possible for a star or planetary system -- given the right mass and velocity -- to fall into orbit around a galaxy but be far, far outside that galaxy's main body of orbiting objects.

Friday, October 28, 2016


Ecclesiastes 7:21
"Don't listen to everything that is spoken— you may hear your servant cursing you,"

Telephone tapping (also wire tapping or wiretapping in American English) is the monitoring of telephone and Internet conversations by a third party, often by covert means. The wire tap received its name because, historically, the monitoring connection was an actual electrical tap on the telephone line. Legal wiretapping by a government agency is also called lawful interception. Passive wiretapping monitors or records the traffic, while active wiretapping alters or otherwise affects it.

Lawful interception is officially strictly controlled in many countries to safeguard privacy; this is the case in all developed democracies. In theory, telephone tapping often needs to be authorized by a court, and is, again in theory, normally only approved when evidence shows it is not possible to detect criminal or subversive activity in less intrusive ways; often the law and regulations require that the crime investigated must be at least of a certain severity.Illegal or unauthorized telephone tapping is often a criminal offense.However, in certain jurisdictions such as Germany and France, courts will accept illegally recorded phone calls without the other party's consent as evidence, but the unauthorized telephone tapping will still be prosecuted.

Saturday, October 1, 2016



God called the light “day,” (yom) and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day (yom).-Genesis 1:5

The "Day " in Hebrew is " Yom"

The word "Yom's" root meaning is to be hot as the warm hours of a day.

Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that has become a bane of modern society, may have saved Earth from freezing over early in the planet’s history, according to the first detailed laboratory analysis of the world’s oldest sedimentary rocks.

Scientists have theorized for years that high concentrations of greenhouse gases could have helped Earth avoid global freezing in its youth by allowing the atmosphere to retain more heat than it lost. Now a team from the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder that analyzed ancient rocks from the eastern shore of Hudson Bay in northern Quebec, Canada, have discovered the first direct field evidence supporting this theory.

The study shows carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere could have sustained surface temperatures above freezing before 3.75 billion years ago according to the researchers, led by University of Chicago Assistant Professor Nicolas Dauphas. Co-authors on the study, which appeared online Jan. 16 in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters, included Assistant Professor Stephen Mojzsis and doctoral student Nicole Cates of CU-Boulder’s geological sciences department and Vincent Busigny, now of the Institut de Physique du Globe in Paris.

The new study helps explain how Earth may have avoided becoming frozen solid early in its history, when astrophysicists believe the sun was 25 percent fainter than today. Previous studies had shown liquid water existed at Earth’s surface even though the weak sun should have been unable to warm the planet above freezing conditions. But high concentrations of CO2 or methane could have warmed the planet, according to the research team.

The ancient rocks from Quebec contain iron carbonates believed to have precipitated from ancient oceans, according to the study. Since the iron carbonates could only have formed in an atmosphere containing far higher CO2 levels than those found in Earth’s atmosphere today, the researchers concluded the early Earth environment was extremely rich in CO2.

"We now have direct evidence that Earth’s atmosphere was loaded with CO2 early in its history, which probably kept the planet from freezing and going the way of Mars," said Mojzsis.

The CO2 could even have played a role as a "planetary thermostat," since cold, icy conditions on Earth would have decreased the chemical weathering of rocks and increased the amount of CO2 moving into the atmosphere, ratcheting up Earth’s surface temperatures, according to Dauphas.

Around this time the atmosphere was predominantly consisted of methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3), two extremely important greenhouse gases, thus their radiative forcing kept the Earth’s atmosphere warm and toasty!

Monday, September 12, 2016


Scientist believe that there is a dark matter in Universe my God is dwell in thinck darkness

1Kings 8:12
Then Solomon said, “The LORD has said that he would dwell in thick darkness.

From the beggining God is light

1John 1:5
This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

God is the  source of dark energy or light  he created light .

Isaiah 45:7
I create the light..."

God emerge light from the darkness when God said LET THERE BE LIGHT.

The Big bang explode light from the  light of the dark energy.

Genesis 1:3
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.

From the big bang explotion the light shineth in the darkness of universe.

John 1:5
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

In that explotion God created All things or matter through His Word

John 1:1-3
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.The same was in the beginning with God.All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

In that Word is the son of God Jesus Christ.  (John 1:14,18) All things were made by him without him was not anything made .

Jesus Christ is the light (John 8:12) he is the light that gave life .

John 1:4
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

In that light all living creature emerge to existence.

All things made by his power, wisdom and understanding.

Jeremiah 10:12
It is he who made the earth by his power, who established the world by his wisdom, and by his understanding stretched out the heavens.

Saturday, September 10, 2016


God made living creature from WATER that SPRING LIFE.

Genesis 1:20
And God said, "Let the water spring with living creatures..."

The water that spring life is the Hot spring in the deep of the Oceans that called " HYDROTHERMAL VENT"

hydrothermal vent is a fissure in a planet's surface from which geothermally heated water issues. Hydrothermal vents are commonly found near volcanically active places, areas where tectonic plates are moving apart, ocean basins, and hotspots. Hydrothermal vents exist because the earth is both geologically active and has large amounts of water on its surface and within its crust. Common land types include hot springs, fumaroles and geysers. Under the sea, hydrothermal vents may form features called black smokers.

Scientist believe that LIFE emerged from the Ocean in the hot spring called "hydrothermal vent".

One of the greatest mysteries facing humans is how life originated on Earth. Scientists have determined approximately when life began (roughly 3.8 billion years ago), but there is still intense debate about exactly how life began. One possibility has grown in popularity in the last two decades - that simple metabolic reactions emerged near ancient seafloor hot springs, enabling the leap from a non-living to a living world.

Recent research by geochemists Eoghan Reeves, Jeff Seewald, and Jill McDermott at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) is the first to test a fundamental assumption of this ‘metabolism first’ hypothesis, and finds that it may not have been as easy as previously assumed. Instead, their findings could provide a focus for the search for life on other planets. The work is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

In 1977, scientists discovered biological communities unexpectedly living around seafloor hydrothermal vents, far from sunlight and thriving on a chemical soup rich in hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and sulfur, spewing from the geysers. Inspired by these findings, scientists later proposed that hydrothermal vents provided an ideal environment with all the ingredients needed for microbial life to emerge on early Earth. A central figure in this hypothesis is a simple sulfur-containing carbon compound called “methanethiol” - a supposed geologic precursor of the Acetyl-CoA enzyme present in many organisms, including humans.  Scientists suspected methanethiol could have been the “starter dough” from which all life emerged.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016



Saturday, July 16, 2016



As it is ,you are determined to kill me ,a [ God that become] man who told you the truth that I heard from [Father] God .Abraham did not do such things.

 John 8:40 ( with textual interpretation from John 1:1,14)

 For there is one God [the Father] and one mediator between God [the [Father ] and men ,the [ Son of God being found in the apperance as a] man Jesus Christ .

1Timothy 2:5 (With textual interpretation from 1John 5:20 and Philippians 2:7-8

 For he [Father ] has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the [ Son who become] man;he has appointed .He has given proof of this to men by rising him [dead body ] from the dead.

Acts17:31 (with textual interpretation from John 1:1,14,18 and 1Peter 3:18)

Men of Israel ,listen to this :Jesus of Nazareth was [God found in apperance as ] a man acredited by [Father] God;to you by miracles , wonders and signs;which;God [the Father];did amongs you through him. As you yourselves know.This [son of God that become] man was handed over to you by God [the Father] set purpose and foreknowledge..."

 Acts2:22 (with textual interpretation from Philippians 2:6-8 and 1John 5:20,John 1:14

Thursday, June 30, 2016


Si Jesus ay Dios!


ITONG DIOS NA SI JESUS AY ANAK NG DIOS DAHIL ANAK NG DIOS TUNAY DIOS .(1Juan 5:20) ITONG TUNAY NA DIOS NA SI JESUS NAGKATAWANG TAO.(Juan 1:1-3,14) Nung magkatawang tao nag anyong alipin at nakitulad sa mga tao anopat nasumpungan sa anyong tao.(Filipos 2:6-8) at kanyang tiniis ang kahinaan ng tao.(Nehemias 9:30) bagamat siya'y Dios sa loob ay  nagbata sa laman.(Hebreo 2:18).

Ang pinatay kay JESUS AY ANG LAMAN...pinatay siya sa laman..."SIYANG PINATAY SA LAMAN..."(1Pedro 3:18) PERO ANG NASA LOOB NG LAMAN AY DIOS ANAK NA ESPIRITU.(Colosas 2:9)



Binuhay uli  uli yon kaya bumangon siya sa GITNA ng mga patay.(Gawa 3:15)

Saturday, June 25, 2016


Bakit ang Panginoong Jesus tinawag na LINGKOD sa Gawa 3:13?

Kung babasahin natin ang kontexto sa Gawa 3:13 itong lingkod ay ito rin ang pinatay na lumikha ng buhay sa Gawa 3:15

Kaya ito ay manlilikha ng buhay ang Dios ang lumikha ng buhay. (Gawa 17:28) at si Cristo ay buhay. (Juan 1:4)

ito rin ang VERBO na Dios na nagkatawang tao. (Juan 1:1-2,14) kaya siya LINGKOD dahil siya ay NAG-ANYONG ALIPIN  O LINGKOD at Nakitulad sa mga tao. (Filipos 2:6-7)

Sunday, June 19, 2016


Maraming Katoliko naniniwala na ang kanilang mga larawang inanyuan ay mga sagradong bagay ibig sabihin "banal" o santo.

Kaya ganon nalang ang pagpaparangal na inoukol  ng mga katoliko sa mga larawang  inanyuan na ito na tinatawag nilang mga santo.

Ito mga tinatawag nilang mga santo ay mga larawang inanyuan na nililok sa kaanyuan ni Jesus, ni Maria at ng mga kinikilalang mga banal na tao ng simbahan,maging ng mga anghel.

Tinatawag itong mga sacred object o mga banal na bagay

Entitled to veneration or religious respect by association with divinity or divine things, or holy.

Kaya ang kahulugan ng sacred ay "Holy" o banal

Ngayon ano ang babala ng Biblia sa mga taong tumatawag sa mga bagay na ito na "santo" halimbawa tinawag mo ang isang rebulto ng isang santo ng simbahan na gawa sa bato.

At tinawag mo yon at kinilala na isang sagrado o santo.

Ito ang mahigpit na pag kontra ng Biblia.

"And do not erect a SACRED STONE, For these the Lord your God HATES. (Deuteronomy 16:22 NIV)

Ito pala ay isang gawaing kinapopootan ng Panginoong Dios na tawagin o kilalanin mo ang isang bato na isang sagrado o banal.

At ito ay  tuwirang sumasalungat sa aral katoliko na ang mga rebulto na kanilang  ginawa ay itinuturing nilang mga sagrado o isang santo matapus ma bindesyunan ng pari.

Ito ay taliwas at isang lisyang katuroan na kinapopootan ng Dios.

Saturday, March 5, 2016


Who is Joan of Arc:

Joan of Arc (French: Jeanne d'Arc,6 January c. 1412 – 30 May 1431), nicknamed "The Maid of Orléans" (French: La Pucelle d'Orléans) is considered a heroine of France for her role during the Lancastrian phase of the Hundred Years' War, and was canonized as a Roman Catholic saint. Joan of Arc was born to Jacques d'Arc and Isabelle, a peasant family, atDomrémy in north-east France. Joan said she received visions of the Archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherineinstructing her to support Charles VII and recover France from English domination late in the Hundred Years' War. The uncrowned King Charles VII sent Joan to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief mission. She gained prominence after the siege was lifted only nine days later. Several additional swift victories led to Charles VII's coronation at Reims. This long-awaited event boosted French morale and paved the way for the final French victory.

On 23 May 1430, she was captured at Compiègne by the Burgundian faction which was allied with the English. She was later handed over to the English, and then put on trial by the pro-English Bishop of Beauvais Pierre Cauchon on a variety of charges. After Cauchon declared her guilty she was burned at the stake on 30 May 1431, dying at about nineteen years of age.

Catholic Church accuse Joan of Arc and burned at the stake as a heretics 

on 9 January 1431 at Rouen, the seat of the English occupation government.The procedure was suspect on a number of points, which would later provoke criticism of the tribunal by the chief inquisitor who investigated the trial after the war

Under ecclesiastical law, Bishop Cauchon lacked jurisdiction over the case. Cauchon owed his appointment to his partisan support of the English government which financed the trial. The low standard of evidence used in the trial also violated inquisitorial rules. Clerical notary Nicolas Bailly, who was commissioned to collect testimony against Joan, could find no adverse evidence. Without such evidence the court lacked grounds to initiate a trial. Opening a trial anyway, the court also violated ecclesiastical law by denying her the right to a legal adviser. In addition, stacking the tribunal entirely with pro-English clergy violated the medieval Church's requirement that heresy trials needed to be judged by an impartial or balanced group of clerics. Upon the opening of the first public examination, Joan complained that those present were all partisans against her and asked for "ecclesiastics of the French side" to be invited in order to provide balance. This request was denied.

The Vice-Inquisitor of Northern France (Jean Lemaitre) objected to the trial at its outset, and several eyewitnesses later said he was forced to cooperate after the English threatened his life.Some of the other clergy at the trial were also threatened when they refused to cooperate, including a Dominican friar named Isambart de la Pierre.These threats, and the domination of the trial by a secular government, were violations of the Church's rules and undermined the right of the Church to conduct heresy trials without secular interference.and then put on trial by the pro-English Bishop of Beauvais Pierre Cauchon on a variety of charges. After Cauchon declared her guilty she was burned at the stake on 30 May 1431

Catholic Church canonized Joan of Arc as a Catholic Saint

Twenty-five years after her execution, an inquisitorial court authorized by Pope Callixtus III examined the trial, debunked the charges against her, pronounced her innocent, and declared her a martyr. In the 16th century she became a symbol of the Catholic League, and in 1803 she was declared a national symbol of France by the decision of Napoleon Bonaparte.She was beatified in 1909 and canonized in 1920. Joan of Arc is one of the nine secondary patron saints of France, along with St. Denis, St. Martin of Tours, St. Louis, St. Michael, St. Remi, St. Petronilla, St. Radegund and St. Thérèse of Lisieux.

Pope Benedict XV canonized Joan on 16 May 1920.

The Bible say to this Modern Pharisees

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. (Matthew 23:29-31)


Ex cathedra is a Latin phrase which means "from the chair." It refers to binding and infallible papal teachings which are promulgated by the pope when he officially teaches in his capacity of the universal shepherd of the Church a doctrine on a matter of faith or morals and addresses it to the entire world. 

Only God alone is a Law giver of the Church in matter of faith or moral laws not the pope. 

God alone, who gave the law, is the Judge. He alone has the power to save or to destroy..."(James 4:12)

From the Chair of Scoffer:

Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers;(Psalms 1:1)

Sunday, February 28, 2016


From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts out its leaves, you know that summer is near.(Matthew 24:32)

Botany, also called plant science(s) or plant biology, is the science of plant life and a branch of biology. A botanist or plant scientist is a scientist who specializes in this field of study.


"... Indeed, the world is established, firm and secure.(Psalms 93:1 NIV)

Currently, the Earth is spinning about 1000 miles per hour at the equator. A LOT less towards the poles. An appreciable change in rotation direction would produce winds with speeds of thousands of miles per hour EVERYWHERE. Anything not anchored to bedrock would be torn out of the soil and mixed with a world-enveloping hurricane of activity. The Earth would remain engulfed in thick clouds of dirt, dust and debris for decades. I cannot imagine anything surviving such a catastrophy, because the solid Earth would be wracked by earthquakes the likes of which have never been experienced by living organisms in over 3 billion years or more. There would be no spot on the Earth not affected by 100 - 500 mile per hour winds and earthquakes of magnitude +7 and MUCH HIGHER.

Any scenario that includes such a catastrophy would have to presume the complete destruction of the biosphere as a given. The only survivors would be bacteria. The tidal forced exerted upon the Earth would be enough to raise the surface of the earth several miles or more, and the tidal energy would probably be enough in a close encounter to liquify large portions of the crust.

The polar ice caps would be melted by any change in the mean global temperature, and the changing wind patterns and tectonic activity would provide a more than adequate source of heating. After they melted, and the sea level rose by 30 feet, they would eventually reform when the Earth settled down to its new spin orientation assuming the temperature of the atmosphere returned to current levels. I don't really see that that would happen for many centuries afterwards because it takes time for the Earth to cool after such a cataclysmic change. Perhaps millions of years would be needed to quell the vulcanism that must surely result from such a realignment. The carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and the consequent Greenhouse Heating would probably stay with the Earth for millennia.

If the collision was a direct one with a body, say, as large as the asteroid Ceres ( 450 kilometers) this would produce a crater larger than the continent of North America, and probably be enough of an impulse to cause the axis of the Earth to precess with a very large amplitude over thousands of years. I can't be too specific because the details depend on the geometry and energy of the impact. Most solar system bodies are 1) orbiting the Sun in the same sense as the Earth is rotation, so such impacts probably would not greatly affect the spin direction, but might increase the spin rate so that a day might be several hours shorter than the standard 24 hours. If the impact is a grazing collision, portions of the Earth's mass would be ejected into space to orbit the Earth, be lost from the Earth's gravitational field, or eventually rain back upon the Earth as a lethal meteor storm lasting hundreds or thousands of years. I can't imagine what it would be like living through such times when death could fall out of the sky at any moment.

Sorry to be so gloomy. It's all pretty hypothetical anyway. There are lots of other things of greater likelihood that are bound to happen to the Earth in the next hundred thousand years that would be more local, but still lethal.

A change in the rotation axis of the Earth, or its spin rate would be catastrophic. The number of the seasons would change and their duration. If the rotation axis became parallel to the orbital plane, as for Uranus, we could have winter in the Northern hemisphere for 6 months followed by summer. The Sun would set on the entire Northern hemisphere and not rise again for 6 months. Less extreme axial tilts would produce a dA change in the rotation axis of the Earth, or its spin rate would be catastrophic. The number of the seasons would change and their duration. If the rotation axis became parallel to the orbital plane, as for Uranus, we could have winter in the Northern hemisphere for 6 months followed by summer. The Sun would set on the entire Northern hemisphere and not rise again for 6 months. Less extreme axial tilts would produce a different pattern of seasons at each earth latitude.

Growing seasons and all of the natural cycles of the biosphere would be catastrophically affected, and if the change happened in a year or so, no living things, especially plants, would survive unmolested. There would not be enough time for plants to genetically alter their growing cycles. Large diebacks of plant ecosystems would occur followed by the animals that feed on the plants, and then the carnivores...etc etc.

If the length of the day changed appreciably, we would still operate on the basis of the 24 hour cycle because that is genetically programmed into us, but for organisms that rely on the 24 hour day to set their reproductive cycles and feeding cycles, they may be adversely affected.

Still, to seriously affect the Earth's rotation axis and spin, you would need a catastrophic force ( collision etc) whose physical affect would in itself be enough to exterminate much of the biosphere. Any changes in the seasons would be the least of the concerns of the biosphere compared to surviving the cause of the change itself!ifferent pattern of seasons at each earth latitude.

Growing seasons and all of the natural cycles of the biosphere would be catastrophically affected, and if the change happened in a year or so, no living things, especially plants, would survive unmolested. There would not be enough time for plants to genetically alter their growing cycles. Large diebacks of plant ecosystems would occur followed by the animals that feed on the plants, and then the carnivores...etc etc.

If the length of the day changed appreciably, we would still operate on the basis of the 24 hour cycle because that is genetically programmed into us, but for organisms that rely on the 24 hour day to set their reproductive cycles and feeding cycles, they may be adversely affected.

Still, to seriously affect the Earth's rotation axis and spin, you would need a catastrophic force ( collision etc) whose physical affect would in itself be enough to exterminate much of the biosphere. Any changes in the seasons would be the least of the concerns of the biosphere compared to surviving the cause of the change itself!

Tuesday, February 16, 2016


Hindi lingid sa kaalaman natin ang pagsamba na inuukol ng mga Romano Katoliko sa mga "Anghel"

mayroong pag-paparangal na iginagawad ang mga katoliko sa mga nilalang na ito bukod sa pagluhod sa harap ng larawan nito nag-uukol pa ang mga katoliko ng panalangin sa kanila.

Isa sa mga kilalang Anghel na pinaparangalan ng mga katoliko at ginagawang patron ay si ArKanghel Gabriel at ArKanghel Miguel.

Ang pag pagsamba sa mga Anghel ay tuwirang paglabag sa Utos ng Dios na sa Dios ka lamang sasamba.(Mateo 4:10)

Ang mga Anghel ng Dios ay hindi nagpapasamba.(Apocalipsis 22:6-9) ang pagsamba sa Anghel ay isang uri ng Idolatriya.(Colosas 2:18) sapagkat ito ay pagsamba sa nilalang at hindi sa lumalang.(Roma 1:25) ang pagsamba sa mga anghel ay pagsamba sa mga demonyo sapagkat ang mga demonyo ay mga anghel na iniwan ang kanilang mga dating katagayan at nagpakasama .(Deuteronomio 32:17)

Friday, February 5, 2016



From the Exsultet of Pope Francis HE said:

(In Latin)

Flammas eius lúcifer matutínus invéniat:
ille, inquam, lúcifer, qui nescit occásum.
Christus Fílius tuus,
qui, regréssus ab ínferis, humáno géneri serénus illúxit,
et vivit et regnat in sæcula sæculórum.

May the Lucifer find it yet alight:
Oh Lucifer who will never be defeated, CHRIST IS YOUR SON,
who, coming back from death's domain,
has shed his peaceful light on humanity,
and lives and reigns for ever and ever.

Reference:(Pope Francis -Easter Vigils in 2013 at St. Peter's Basilica in Rome)

Use of the name “Lucifer” for the Devil stems from applying to the Devil what Isaiah 14:3–20 says of a king of Babylon whom it calls Helel (הֵילֵל, Shining One), a Hebrew word that refers to the Day Star or Morning Star (the Latin term for which is lucifer)

“Lucifer” is actually a Hebrew word when translated means “shining one.” The Septuagint uses the Greek word that means “bringer of dawn.” That is why some translations render the original Hebrew “morning star” or “Daystar.” But Jerome’s Latin Vulgate uses “Lucifer” (light bearer), and this accounts for the appearance of that term in various versions of the Bible.

Douay-Rheims Bible (Isaiah 14:12)
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?

The 'name' Lucifer occurs once in the Scriptures (Isa. 14:12) and only in some versions of the Bible. Traditionally, Lucifer is a name that in English generally refers to the Devil before being cast from heaven. But this description is given to a man and not to a spirit creature as is further seen by the statement: “Down to Sheol you will be brought.” Sheol is the common grave of mankind—not a place occupied by Satan the Devil.

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Star of Bethlehem Scientifically Confirms Biblical Events

Dr. Grant J. Mathews, a professor of theoretical astrophysics and cosmology at the University of Notre Dame and the director of the school’s Center for Astrophysics, believes the astronomical event that led the Magi to the manger where Jesus lay is quite real. The only dispute Mathews has with the Star of Bethlehem is that it may have not been a real star, since people of that time period would have perceived a star to be a bad omen.

“It’s probably not a ‘star’ somehow hovering over a manger and pointing a beam of light as we traditionally view it. Any new star or comet in the sky was usually taken as a harbinger of disaster at that time,” Mathews said. “It was most likely an unusual planetary alignment.”

Matthew 2:1-9 "Stars of  Bethelehem " The Birth of the Messiah

If the planets were to align in that era, Mathews believes it was the “occurrence of the Sun, Moon, Jupiter, and Saturn in Aries, with Venus in the next-door constellation Pisces along with Mercury and Mars on the other side in the next constellation Taurus.” The ancient astronomer Ptolemy is said to corroborate this theory since the constellation Aries is associated with ancient Israel.

Michael Molnar published his own ideas on this theory in The Star of Bethlehem, and in a recent interview with Christianity Today he offered an exact date for when it occurred.

“I was amazed to find April 17, 6 B.C., was exactly when Jupiter was ‘in the East,’ a morning star,” Molnar said. “So I knew I had an answer to the Star of Bethlehem.”

This would mean that when the Bible speaks of the “the star they had seen when it rose went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was” would have referred to the planet Jupiter coming to rest in Aries.

“The other planets and the Sun and Moon being there would have strengthened this and held great significance to the Magi,” Matthews said. “That is why they would have arrived in Herod’s court to ask, ‘Where is new born ruler of Judea?'”

Out of all of Jesus miracles, Mathews said that such a planetary alignment is truly unique since it will not occur again for the next half a million years. 

Thursday, January 7, 2016


Why Jesus mention about THE SALT and LIGHT in Matthew 5:13-14

"Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. 
Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. "

can a SALT be a LIGHT?

Here the wisdom!!!

UNITED States President Barack Obama on Wednesday lauded Filipina engineer Aisa Mijeno, who invented lamps powered by saline solution, during a forum for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) Summit 2015 in Manila.

After delivering a speech, Obama led a forum during the Apec CEO Summit on Wednesday. Obama addressed questions to Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba, a giant e-commerce firm, and Mijeno, an engineer and Greenpeace member who founded SALT Philippines.

The project provides lighting to areas without electricity with the creation of lamps that run on saline solution. The same solution is also used to charge mobile phones, Mijeno said during the forum.

A SALt lamp is an LED lamp powered by the galvanic reaction of an anode with saline water. The anode must be replaced every six months or so and the saline water daily. Sea water works. The SALt lamp was invented and is marketed by Aisa Mijeno, a Filipino inventor and entrepreneur.